Not a private storm
Wait, please. Initial downloading takes longer than usual.
Rotate
device
Video
Lawsuits involving resolved
banks
Lawsuits involving PrivatBank
and the NBU
Lawsuits on refinancing loans
granted by the NBU
Information on lawsuits involving resolved banks
Information on lawsuits involving resolved banks
Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Contesting of banks’ insolvency and liquidation
10
11
Number
of
cases
33
In courts
of first
instance
12
In courts
of
appeal
2
In the
court of
cassation
20

Number of rulings
21
10 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

of which 9 took effect (the rulings apply to the following banks: Ukrinbank – 1, Commercial Bank Khreschatyk – 2, Bank Sofiyskiy – 1, PrivatBank – 1, Bank Mykhailivskyi – 1, PC Bank – 1, Green Bank – 1, Ukrkomunbank – 1, East-Industrial Bank– 1)

11 court rulings
against the NBU

of which 9 took effect (the rulings apply to the following banks: Ukrinbank – 1, Commercial Bank Khreschatyk – 2, Bank Sofiyskiy – 1, PrivatBank – 1, Bank Mykhailivskyi – 1, PC Bank – 1, Green Bank – 1, Ukrkomunbank – 1, East-Industrial Bank– 1)


Show commentary Hide commentary

NBU’s comments on resolved banks

Ukrinbank:

  1. Loss of liquidity: in September 2015, the instant liquidity ratio (N4) declined more than 5% at least five times.
  2. As part of the financial rehabilitation plan, the bank planned to attract UAH 500 million from an investor to restore liquidity, but never received the funds.
  3. As at 21 December 2015, the bank failed to conduct client transactions worth UAH 52 million on time.
  4. During the resolution of Ukrinbank PJSC, an authorized official of the Deposit Guarantee Fund (DGF) filed 11 statements with law enforcement authorities, alleging the bank had committed crimes resulting in UAH 864.28 million in losses. That includes three statements regarding the bank’s owners, leadership, and executives.

Commercial Bank Khreschatyk:

  1. Diagnostics revealed a loss of capital, a sharp deterioration in the liquidity situation at the end of March 2016 as a result of withdrawals of funds by companies related to the bank’s owners, and delayed payments to customers.
  2. The shareholders did not confirm their willingness to provide real and prompt financial support to the bank, although the bulk of the bank’s assets was related to granting loans to majority shareholders’ businesses.
  3. Due to failure to meet liquidity and capital standards, the bank was declared insolvent.

KSG Bank:

  1. The bank introduced cash conversion schemes: legal entities, sole proprietors, and credit unions carried out a series of transactions that resulted in millions being paid into bank accounts of individuals and converted into cash. Individuals involved in the schemes delegated their rights to dispose of their accounts to the bank’s client with a fake passport. To that single client, the bank issued more than 500 additional payment cards.
  2. Information on financial transactions of the bank’s clients has been provided to law enforcement agencies.

CB Union

  1. In 2015–2016, the bank broke financial monitoring laws in a systemic manner.
  2. In March 2016, the bank obstructed an inspection by the NBU.
  3. According to the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, the NBU’s findings on the detected financial transactions of the bank’s clients were annexed to the criminal proceedings.

CB Financial Initiative

  1. Loss of capital and liquidity. Lack of UAH 183 million in cash.
  2. The majority of household deposits went to finance the needs of agroindustrial companies of the bank’s owner Oleh Bakhmatiuk, and related companies. The actual volume of loans granted to companies related to the bank’s owner accounted for about 96% of the loan portfolio.
  3. With this approach, the bank’s liquidity became significantly dependent on the financial standing of companies related to the bank’s owner. As long as household deposits grew in volume, this dependence was barely noticeable, as depositor funds obscured the bank’s problems.
  4. When the 2014 crisis broke out, the household deposit portfolio stopped growing, and related parties stopped making regular repayments on loans they had taken out from the bank, which caused serious liquidity problems.
  5. The bank ceased to meet its obligations to depositors, other creditors, and the NBU, to which it owed repayments on refinancing loans.
  6. The bank’s owner failed to stabilize the situation and restore the solvency of the bank.

JSCCB Capital

  1. Misrepresentation of financial statements.
  2. Loss of liquidity and capital.

Bank Veles

  1. In September 2015, the NBU prevented an attempt to move nearly USD 460 million out of Ukraine on fake documents.
  2. Nearly 90% of the bank’s transactions were risky. The bank made them using counterfeit documents. These transactions give reason to infer they were aimed at: avoidance of fulfillment of requirements and restrictions stipulated by banking, currency, and financial monitoring laws; participation (provision of services) by the bank in carrying out financial transactions intended to withdraw capital (transactions through which funds were moved abroad in particular, and other transactions).
  3. In less than the 12 months of 2015, these transactions exceeded USD 100 million in volume.

Novyi JSCB

  1. Failure to meet N1 ratio requirements (the bank’s regulatory capital was lower than 1/3 of the required minimum).

Bank Premium

  1. Systematic violation of financial monitoring laws.
Lawsuits involving PrivatBank and the NBU
Lawsuits involving PrivatBank and the NBU
Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Contesting the resolution of PrivatBank
2
2
Number
of
cases
5
In courts
of first
instance
2
In courts
of
appeal
1
In the
court of
cassation
2

Number of rulings
4
2 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Came into force

2 court ruling
against the NBU

One of which came into force


Plaintiffs

Іhor Kolomoiskyi, Triantal Investments LTD (owners: Іhor Kolomoiskyi, Henadii Boholiubov) and an individual

The court hearing
the case

District Administrative Court of Kyiv, Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal, Kyiv Economic Court

Contesting the state’s participation in PrivatBank’s capital
2
0
Number
of
cases
2

Number of rulings
2
2 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Took effect and the cases were closed.

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Plaintiffs

Unrelated individuals

The court hearing
the case

District Administrative Court of Kyiv, Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal, Kyiv Economic Court

Contesting the surety of Ihor Kolomoiskyi
0
1
Number
of
cases
2
In courts
of first
instance
1
In courts
of
appeal
1

Number of rulings
1
0 court rulings
in favor of the NBU
1 court ruling
against the NBU

The ruling has not come into force (Pechersk District Court of Kyiv)


Plaintiffs

Ihor Kolomoiskyi

The court hearing
the case

Pechersk District Court of Kyiv

Contesting of relatedness
1
10
Number
of
cases
45
In courts
of first
instance
37
In courts
of
appeal
6
In the
court of
cassation
2

Number of rulings
11
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Came into force

10 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 4 took effect


Plaintiffs

The Surkis family and offshore companies thereto related; companies related to Ihor Kolomoiskyi and Henadii Boholiubov

The court hearing
the case

Administrative courts

Contesting the bail-in procedure
12
2
Number
of
cases
10
In courts
of first
instance
5
In courts
of
appeal
2
In the
court of
cassation
3

Number of rulings
14
12 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 11 took effect

2 court ruling
against the NBU

One of which came into force


Plaintiffs

Individuals or legal entities that participated in the bail-in procedure

The court hearing
the case

District and economic courts

Contesting the bail-in procedure (bondholders)
0
1
Number
of
cases
2
In courts
of first
instance
1
In the
court of
cassation
1

Number of rulings
1
0 court rulings
in favor of the NBU
1 court ruling
against the NBU

Came into force


Plaintiffs

Bondholders:  Theo Worldwide Corp., Pointex Sale LLP

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court

Lawsuits by providers of property surety on refinancing loans
122
5
Number
of
cases
40
In courts
of first
instance
35
In courts
of
appeal
5

Number of rulings
127
122 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 69 took effect

5 court rulings
against the NBU

Which are being appealed in higher courts


Plaintiffs

Mortgagor

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court

Lawsuits against providers of property surety and financial surety on refinancing loans
24
3
Number
of
cases
123
In courts
of first
instance
117
In courts
of
appeal
5
In the
court of
cassation
1

Number of rulings
27
24 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 19 took effect (including one amicable settlement)

3 court ruling
against the NBU

The ruling has not come into force


Plaintiffs

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Economic jurisdiction courts

Lawsuit against a financial surety provider (Switzerland)
Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of first
instance
1

Number of rulings
0
court rulings
in favor of the NBU
court rulings
against the NBU

Plaintiffs

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Swiss jurisdiction


Show commentary Hide commentary

Only pretrial hearings have taken place so far, the trial itself still pending

Lawsuits by/against providers of property surety and financial surety on refinancing loans granted by the NBU
Lawsuits by/against providers of property surety and financial surety on refinancing loans granted by the NBU
{{ label }}
All causes
Contesting a surety
Lawsuits by property surety providers
Related-party claims on refinancing loans
Foreclosure on collateral
Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
{{ label }}
All banks
FINANCIAL INITIATIVE 7.64 billion uah of debt
VSEUKRAINSKYI AKSIONERNYI BANK 2.97 billion uah of debt
BANK FINANCE AND CREDIT 6.6 billion uah of debt
DELTA BANK 4.82 billion uah of debt
IMEKSBANK 3.3 billion uah of debt
UKRAINIAN PROFESSIONAL BANK 108.29 million uah of debt

BANK FINANCE AND CREDIT JSC

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Lawsuits by property surety providers
6
0
Bank
debt
6.6 billion uah

Number
of
cases
6
In courts
of first
instance
3
In courts
of
appeal
1
In the
court of
cassation
3

Number of rulings
6
6 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 5 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

Bilotserkivska Thermal Power Plant PJSC
On invalidation of a mortgage agreement
Cases pending in a court of first instance 1  Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1
Rulings of the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine: 2

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court
Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine


Plaintiffs

Rosava PJSC
On recognition of termination of surety agreements
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

Salut Hotel OJSC  
On invalidation of a mortgage agreement
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court

Contesting a surety
1
0
Bank
debt
6.6 billion uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of first
instance
1

Number of rulings
1
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Kyiv Economic Court

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

Kostiantyn Zhevaho
On invalidation of a surety agreement
Cases pending in a court of first instance 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv

Foreclosure on collateral
18
0
Bank
debt
6.6 billion uah

Number
of
cases
29
In courts
of first
instance
27
In courts
of
appeal
2

Number of rulings
18
18 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 16 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Bilotserkivska Thermal Power Plant PJSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance 2  

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Donetsk Institute of Mine Management Design OJSC
On foreclosure on mortgaged property
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Donetsk Oblast Commercial Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Salut Hotel OJSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Initiator-Realty LLC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Kyivmedpreparat OJSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 3 

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Kyiv Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Plant JSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1 

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Osnova Construction Company LLC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

MULREADY VENTURES LIMITED
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Eco Build Service LLC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 10

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Rosava PrJSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 2

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Interprokat LLC
On foreclosure on collateral
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 2

The court hearing
the case

Luhansk Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Stakhanov Railway Car Building Works OJSC
On foreclosure on mortgaged property
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 3

The court hearing
the case

Luhansk Oblast Economic Court

Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
1
0
Bank
debt
6.6 billion uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of first
instance
1

Number of rulings
1
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Kostiantyn Zhevaho
On recovery of UAH 1,539,358,515.35 in debt
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv

IMEKSBANK PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Foreclosure on collateral
2
0
Bank
debt
3.3 billion uah

Number
of
cases
6
In courts
of first
instance
6

Number of rulings
2
2 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 1 have taken effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

UKRBUDSPETSTEKH LLC (formerly known as Black Sea Realty Group)
Foreclosure on collateral

The court of first instance closed the case due to bankruptcy (claims will be discharged at the expense of property in the course of the bankruptcy proceeding)

The court hearing
the case

Odesa Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

SPETSAVTOMATYKA LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1   

The court hearing
the case

Odesa Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Tourism and Manufacturing Company Chorne More OJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
The court of first instance closed the case due to bankruptcy (claims will be discharged at the expense of property in the course of the bankruptcy proceeding)

The court hearing
the case

Odesa Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

ILLICHIVSK PLANT ZBK OJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Odesa Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Odesaprodkontrakt OJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Odesa Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Leonid Klimov
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1

The court hearing
the case

Prymorskyi District Court of Odesa

Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
0
1
Bank
debt
3.3 billion uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of
appeal
1

Number of rulings
1
0 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

1 court ruling
against the NBU

The ruling has not come into force


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Leonid Klimov
On recovery of UAH 309,850,670.07 in debt
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Prymorskyi District Court of Odesa, Odesa Court of Appeal

COMMERCIAL BANK FINANCIAL INITIATIVE PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Lawsuits by property surety providers
2
0
Bank
debt
7.64 billion uah

Number
of
cases
3
In courts
of first
instance
1
In courts
of
appeal
2

Number of rulings
2
2 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 2 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

Agroholding Avangard PJSC (legal successor of Kirovskyi PJSC)
On recognition of termination of surety agreements
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

Ivest-Servis LLC
On recognition of termination of liabilities under agreements
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

М.С. Europa Trans Holding Limited
On recognition of termination of liabilities under agreements
Case pending in the court of first instance 1

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court

Related-party claims on refinancing loans
4
0
Bank
debt
7.64 billion uah

Number
of
cases
4
In courts
of
appeal
4

Number of rulings
4
4 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

QUICKOM LIMITED

Defendant

NBU, CB FINANCIAL INITIATIVE PJSC
On termination of the loan agreement
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 4

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal

Foreclosure on collateral
32
0
Bank
debt
7.64 billion uah

Number
of
cases
47
In courts
of first
instance
21
In courts
of
appeal
16
In the
court of
cassation
10

Number of rulings
32
32 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 14 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Pyriatyn Meat Processing Plant PJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Poltava Oblast Economic Court, Skhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Aidar-An-Miaso Joint Venture
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1  

The court hearing
the case

Luhansk Oblast Economic Court 


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Berehivskyi Meat Processing Plant OJSC
On foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1  
Ruling of the Supreme Court: 1

The court hearing
the case

Zakarpattia Oblast Economic Court,
Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal, Supreme Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Stanislavska Retail Company LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1  
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1
Rulings of the Supreme Court: 2

The court hearing
the case

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast Economic Court, Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Rise Company PJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 2

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Ahromash IF CJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in the Supreme Court: 1

The court hearing
the case

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast Economic Court, Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Engels Agricultural Limited Liability Company
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1

The court hearing
the case

Luhansk Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Prodkontrakt LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Retail Network Favoryt LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 5
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1
Ruling of the Supreme Court: 2

The court hearing
the case

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast Economic Court, Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal, Supreme Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Agricultural Company Starovirivskyi Poultry Processing Plant LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1

The court hearing
the case

Kharkiv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

CRYSTAL LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Vinnytsia Oblast Economic Court, Pivnichno-Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Agroholding Avangard PJSC (legal successor of Kirovskyi PJSC)
Foreclosure on collateral
Ruling of the Supreme Court: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court 


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Investment Company Ahrosoiuz-RP LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 6
Ruling of the Supreme Court: 2

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court, Cherkasy Oblast Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Pustomyty miaso LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Lviv Oblast Economic Court, Zakhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Liferunh LTD
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

AGRICULTURAL COMPANY PLEMTAKHREPRODUKTIR ZUHERSKYI LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Ruling of the Supreme Court: 1

The court hearing
the case

Donetsk Oblast Commercial Court, Skhidnyi Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Zhovtovodskyi Met Processing Plant PrJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Case pending in the court of first instance 1

The court hearing
the case

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast Economic Court, Central Economic Court of Appeal, Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Trostianetskyi Meat Processing Plant OJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Vinnytsia Oblast Economic Court 


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

KYIVSKA POULTRY PROCESSING PLANT LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Korostenskyi Meat Processing Plant OJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Zhytomyr Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

YUROK PLUS LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Lviv Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

TRADING HOUSE TRASMAHISTAL LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Vidradnenske PJSC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Zaporizhzhia Oblast Economic Court, Central Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Ivest-Servis LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Karpatska Petroleum Company LLC
Foreclosure on collateral
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Zakarpattia Oblast Economic Court


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Roman Vasyliuk
Foreclosure on collateral
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Ivano-Frankivsk Court in Ivano-Frankivsk oblast

Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
0
0
Bank
debt
7.64 billion uah

Number
of
cases
5
In courts
of first
instance
5

Number of rulings
0
0 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Oleh Bakhmatiuk
On recovery of UAH 5,626,625,767.92 in debt
Case pending in the court of first instance 5

The court hearing
the case

Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv

VSEUKRAINSKYI AKSIONERNYI BANK PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Related-party claims on refinancing loans
4
0
Bank
debt
2.97 billion uah

Number
of
cases
4
In courts
of
appeal
4

Number of rulings
4
4 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

QUICKOM LIMITED

Defendant

NBU, VAB PJSC
On termination of the loan agreement
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 4

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal

Foreclosure on collateral
1
0
Bank
debt
2.97 billion uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of
appeal
1

Number of rulings
1
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Stanislavska Retail Company LLC
On foreclosure on mortgaged property
Cases pending in courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Pivnichnyi Economic Court of Appeal 

Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
0
0
Bank
debt
2.97 billion uah

Number
of
cases
2
In courts
of first
instance
2

Number of rulings
0
0 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 0 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Oleh Bakhmatiuk
On recovery of UAH 3,141,038,035.82 in debt
Case pending in the court of first instance 2

The court hearing
the case

Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv

UKRAINIAN PROFESSIONAL BANK PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Contesting a surety
3
0
Bank
debt
108.29 million uah

Number
of
cases
3
In courts
of first
instance
1
In the
court of
cassation
2

Number of rulings
3
3 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 3 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

Milkiland N.V. PJSC

Defendant

NBU, DE PROFITRADE (former name of Milkiland-Ukraine), UPB PJSC
On invalidation of a surety agreements
Rulings of the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine: 2

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court, Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court/Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine


Plaintiffs

Anatolii Yurkevych

Defendant

NBU, DE PROFITRADE (former name of Milkiland-Ukraine), UPB PJSC
On invalidation of a surety agreements
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court

Recovery of debt from a surety property provider
1
0
Bank
debt
108.29 million uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of first
instance
1

Number of rulings
1
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 1 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 took effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

DE PROFITRADE (former name of Milkiland-Ukraine)
On recovery of UAH 108,321,133.77 in debt
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Economic Court

DELTA BANK PUBLIC JOINT-STOCK COMPANY

Cause of action
Court rulings in favor of the NBU
Court rulings against the NBU
Lawsuits by property surety providers
1
0
Bank
debt
4.82 billion uah

Number
of
cases
1
In courts
of first
instance
1

Number of rulings
1
1 court ruling
in favor of the NBU

Of which 1 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

Mykola Lahun

Defendant

NBU

The court hearing
the case

Kyievo-Sviatoshynsktyi District Court in Kyiv oblast

Foreclosure on collateral
9
0
Bank
debt
4.82 billion uah

Number
of
cases
10
In courts
of first
instance
9
In courts
of
appeal
1

Number of rulings
9
9 court rulings
in favor of the NBU

Of which 6 took effect

0 court rulings
against the NBU

Of which 0 have taken effect


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

Mykola Lahun
On foreclosure on mortgaged property
Cases pending in a court of first instance: 3
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 5

The court hearing
the case

Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv, Kyievo-Sviatoshynsktyi District Court in Kyiv oblast, Kyiv Court of Appeal


Plaintiffs

NBU

Defendant

ECOENGINEERING LLC
On foreclosure on mortgaged property
Rulings of the courts of first instance: 1
Rulings of courts of appeal: 1

The court hearing
the case

Kyiv Oblast Economic Court

Calendar